Underlying most of the unresolved questions I raised about the PC(USA)’s decisions on Israelis and Palestinians, there is a larger question.
It is the single largest source of contention – and it is one Presbyterians commissioners to the 221st General Assembly should have to conclusively answer yes or no if their views are to be taken seriously.
Should there be a Jewish state?
I don’t mean a state perhaps called Israel.
I’m not even asking about the two state solution – which is up for debate at this year’s GA.
The fact is, some people within the PC(USA) argued for a two state solution that meant one Jew-free state of Palestine, and one multi-ethnic, multi-religious state with a Jewish minority. (That is the NET EFFECT of the disparate demands made on Israel by various PC(USA) GA’s and interest groups.)
It occurs to me that this question is the PC(USA)’s elephant in the room when it comes to Middle East policy.